How to Oppose Trademarks in India: How to, Cost, Time & Process

August 22, 2025 by Amit Kumar

Learn how to oppose a trademark in India under the Trade Marks Act. Step-by-step process, cost, timeline, and legal grounds explained for individuals, businesses & IP firms.

What is Opposition in Trademark?

Trademark opposition is a legal remedy available under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 that allows any aggrieved party to stop the registration of a trademark.

Unlike rectification (post-registration), opposition is a pre-registration safeguard that ensures only genuine, distinctive, and non-conflicting marks are registered.

Opposition proceedings play a crucial role in:

  • Preventing confusingly similar marks from entering the register.

  • Protecting well-known marks from misuse.

  • Safeguarding prior users and business goodwill.

  • Ensuring market clarity and avoiding consumer confusion.

Who Can Oppose a Trademark?

As per Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, “any person” can oppose a trademark. This includes:

  • Registered proprietors of existing marks.

  • Prior users (even if not registered).

  • Competitors who may suffer damage.

  • Consumer groups/public bodies/ any person protecting consumers from deception etc.

There are no limits on the number of opponents. So there could be more than one opposition. Each opposition has to be handled separately

Grounds of Opposition

  • Absolute Grounds (Section 9):
    • Lack of distinctiveness.

    • Descriptive or generic words.

    • Customary terms in trade.

    • Marks against morality, law, or likely to deceive.

  • Relative Grounds (Section 11):
    1. Identical or deceptively similar to an earlier trademark.

    2. Likelihood of confusion among consumers.

    3. Identical/similar to a well-known trademark.

  • Section 13 prohibits the registration of certain marks.
    Names of chemical elements; or  International Non-Proprietary Names (INNs) (as declared by WHO) assigned to pharmaceutical substances, or words deceptively similar to them.

Step 1: Publication in the Trademark Journal

    • Once the Examiner accepts a trademark application—either outright or subject to conditions—it is advertised/published in the Trademark Journal under Section 20 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

    • The publication serves as public notice to all third parties.

    • From the date of publication, any third party has 4 months to oppose the registration (Rule 42, Trade Marks Rules, 2017).

    • If no opposition is filed within this period, the mark proceeds toward registration.

Step 2: Filing of Notice of Opposition (Form TM-O)

    • A party opposing the trademark (the Opponent) must file Form TM-O along with the prescribed fee.

    • The notice must contain:

      • Details of the Opponent (name, address, legal status, etc.)

      • Details of the Applicant and the opposed mark

      • Grounds of Opposition (e.g., similarity with earlier mark, bad faith, descriptiveness, prohibition under Sections 9, 11, 13, etc.)

      • Prayer requesting refusal of the application.

    • Grounds should be clearly drafted, as vague or insufficient pleadings can weaken the case.

    • Power of Authority must be attached along it

Step 3: Counter-Statement by Applicant (Rule 44)

  • Upon receipt of the opposition, the Registry serves a copy of the opposition notice to the Applicant.

  • The Applicant must file a counter-statement (Form TM-O) within 2 months of receiving the notice.

  • Failure to file within the prescribed time → the application is deemed abandoned (Section 21(2)).

  • The counter-statement must specifically address each ground raised by the Opponent.

 Practical Issue: If the counter-statement is filed late, the Registry issues a hearing notice to explain the delay. The Applicant must justify the delay (e.g., unavoidable circumstances, administrative errors). If the justification is unsatisfactory, the application is abandoned.

Step 4: Evidence Stage

  • The evidence stage is divided into three parts:

    (a) Opponent’s Evidence in Support of Opposition (Rule 45)

    • Must be filed within 2 months of receiving the counter-statement.

    • Can be in the form of:

      • Affidavits

      • Documentary evidence (sales invoices, advertisements, market reports, registrations, etc.)

    • If the Opponent chooses not to file evidence, they may rely on the facts stated in the opposition itself (by notifying the Registrar).

    (b) Applicant’s Evidence in Support of Application (Rule 46)

    • Must be filed within 2 months of receiving Opponent’s evidence.

    • Usually includes:

      • Proof of honest adoption and use of the mark

      • Sales and marketing evidence

      • Affidavits from customers/distributors

    • If evidence is not filed, the application is at risk, though the Applicant can rely on facts already asserted.

    (c) Opponent’s Reply Evidence (Rule 47)

    • Must be filed within 1 month of receiving Applicant’s evidence.

    • Allows the Opponent to address and rebut the Applicant’s claims.

 

Practical Issues

    • Delay in filing evidence: The Registry may issue a hearing notice requiring parties to explain delay. Non-compliance can result in evidence being excluded.

    • Insufficiency reports by IP Office: The Registry may object to technical defects, such as:

      • Power of Attorney (POA) not stamped or improperly executed.

      • Missing affidavits or exhibits.

      • Improper verification of documents.

    • Unless cured within the given time, such deficiencies weaken the case and may lead to evidence being disregarded.

Step 5: Hearing

    • Once pleadings and evidence are complete, the Registrar issues a notice of hearing to both parties.

    • Hearings can be conducted physically at the Trademark Registry or virtually via Cisco Webex.

    • During the hearing:

      • Both parties argue their case orally.

      • Reliance is placed on pleadings, evidence, and relevant judicial precedents.

      • Legal arguments typically cover likelihood of confusion, prior use, distinctiveness, or bad faith.

    • The Registrar then records the matter for decision.

 Practical Issue: If statutory timelines were missed earlier (counter-statement, evidence filing), the Registrar may specifically require parties to explain why the matter should not be deemed abandoned. Inadequate justification results in dismissal.

Step 6: Registrar’s Order

    • After considering pleadings, evidence, and oral submissions, the Registrar passes a reasoned order.

    • Possible outcomes:

      • Opposition allowed → application is refused.

      • Opposition dismissed → trademark proceeds to registration.

      • Partial allowance → modifications imposed (limiting specification, disclaimers, etc.).

Step 7: Appeal

  • Aggrieved party may appeal before the High Court.

Example of Opposed Application

 Step/Activity

Doer/Party

Filling/Notice Date  Deadline
Journal Copy

Published

22 Nov 2023 None
TM-O(NOTICE OF OPPOSITION) Filed by Opponent 08 Feb 2024  29 Mar 2024
Opposition Notice

Served to Applicant

 22 Feb 2024  None
TM-O(COUNTER STATEMENT)

Filed by Applicant 

20 Apr 2024  22 Jun 2024
Counter Statement Notice

Served to Opponent 

06 Jun 2024
 None
Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 45 (TOP)

Filed by Opponent

05 Aug 2024  06 Aug 2024
Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 46 (TOP) Filed by Applicant 04 Oct 2024 05 Oct 2024
Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 47 (TOP) Filed by Opponent 01 Nov 2024 04 Nov 202
Hearing Notice Served to Both 12 Mar 2025  None

 

Missed Deadline Opposition Example
 Step/Activity

Doer/Party

Filling/Notice Date  Deadline REMARK
Journal Copy

Published

29/04/2024 None  
TM-O(NOTICE OF OPPOSITION) Filed by Opponent   29/08/2024  29/08/2024  
Opposition Notice

Served to Applicant

 14/10/2024  None  
TM-O(COUNTER STATEMENT)

Filed by Applicant 

09/01/2025  14/02/2025 Deadline Missed
Counter Statement Notice

Served to Opponent 

 16/01/2025
 None  
Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 45 (TOP)

Filed by Opponent

14/03/2025  16/03/2025  
Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 46 (TOP) Filed by Applicant 15/04/2025 14/05/2025  
Hearing Notice Served to Both 22/04/2025   For justifying the delay in filing the Counter-Statement

 

Cost of Opposition Hearings

Stage Cost (Official Fee) Attorney/Agent Fees
Filing Opposition (Form TM-O) ₹2700 (online) / ₹3,000 (physical) ₹10,000–₹50,000+ depending on complexity
Counter-statement (Form TM-O) ₹2700 (online) / ₹3,000 (physical) ₹10,000–₹50,000+ depending on complexity and per opposition
Hearing Expenses No fee ₹20,000–₹1,00,000+, depending on complexity and number of hearing attended.

Business & Strategic Importance of Opposition

  • Startups & MSMEs & Corporates: Opposition is a cost-effective way to prevent competitors from monopolizing similar marks. Ensures brand exclusivity and avoids dilution.

  • Investors & M&A: Ongoing opposition may affect brand valuation.

  • Well-Known Marks: Proactive opposition protects brand reputation globally.

Conclusion: Oppose Early, Protect Strongly

Trademark opposition is a powerful preventive tool to protect your brand before a conflicting mark is registered. Filing timely opposition not only safeguards your goodwill but also strengthens your legal standing against future infringement.

Pro Tip for Startups/MSMEs: Always watch the Trademark Journal and set up monitoring services to detect similar marks early.

FAQs on Trademark Opposition

Q1. Can I oppose a trademark without being registered?
Yes, prior users and aggrieved parties can oppose.

Q2. Is opposition mandatory to prevent future use?
Yes, if you miss opposition, the mark may proceed to registration, making cancellation more complex.

Q3. What if I don’t reply to an opposition?
Your application is deemed abandoned.

Q4. Can I oppose multiple classes in one opposition?
Yes, but fee is charged per class.

Q5. What if opposition is rejected?
You may file an appeal before the High Court.

 

Free Trademark Status Check