August 22, 2025 by Amit Kumar
Trademark opposition is a legal remedy available under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 that allows any aggrieved party to stop the registration of a trademark.
Unlike rectification (post-registration), opposition is a pre-registration safeguard that ensures only genuine, distinctive, and non-conflicting marks are registered.
Opposition proceedings play a crucial role in:
Preventing confusingly similar marks from entering the register.
Protecting well-known marks from misuse.
Safeguarding prior users and business goodwill.
Ensuring market clarity and avoiding consumer confusion.
As per Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, “any person” can oppose a trademark. This includes:
Registered proprietors of existing marks.
Prior users (even if not registered).
Competitors who may suffer damage.
Consumer groups/public bodies/ any person protecting consumers from deception etc.
Lack of distinctiveness.
Descriptive or generic words.
Customary terms in trade.
Marks against morality, law, or likely to deceive.
Identical or deceptively similar to an earlier trademark.
Likelihood of confusion among consumers.
Identical/similar to a well-known trademark.
Once the Examiner accepts a trademark application—either outright or subject to conditions—it is advertised/published in the Trademark Journal under Section 20 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
The publication serves as public notice to all third parties.
From the date of publication, any third party has 4 months to oppose the registration (Rule 42, Trade Marks Rules, 2017).
If no opposition is filed within this period, the mark proceeds toward registration.
A party opposing the trademark (the Opponent) must file Form TM-O along with the prescribed fee.
The notice must contain:
Details of the Opponent (name, address, legal status, etc.)
Details of the Applicant and the opposed mark
Grounds of Opposition (e.g., similarity with earlier mark, bad faith, descriptiveness, prohibition under Sections 9, 11, 13, etc.)
Prayer requesting refusal of the application.
Grounds should be clearly drafted, as vague or insufficient pleadings can weaken the case.
Upon receipt of the opposition, the Registry serves a copy of the opposition notice to the Applicant.
The Applicant must file a counter-statement (Form TM-O) within 2 months of receiving the notice.
Failure to file within the prescribed time → the application is deemed abandoned (Section 21(2)).
The counter-statement must specifically address each ground raised by the Opponent.
The evidence stage is divided into three parts:
Must be filed within 2 months of receiving the counter-statement.
Can be in the form of:
Affidavits
Documentary evidence (sales invoices, advertisements, market reports, registrations, etc.)
If the Opponent chooses not to file evidence, they may rely on the facts stated in the opposition itself (by notifying the Registrar).
Must be filed within 2 months of receiving Opponent’s evidence.
Usually includes:
Proof of honest adoption and use of the mark
Sales and marketing evidence
Affidavits from customers/distributors
If evidence is not filed, the application is at risk, though the Applicant can rely on facts already asserted.
Must be filed within 1 month of receiving Applicant’s evidence.
Allows the Opponent to address and rebut the Applicant’s claims.
Practical Issues
Delay in filing evidence: The Registry may issue a hearing notice requiring parties to explain delay. Non-compliance can result in evidence being excluded.
Insufficiency reports by IP Office: The Registry may object to technical defects, such as:
Power of Attorney (POA) not stamped or improperly executed.
Missing affidavits or exhibits.
Improper verification of documents.
Unless cured within the given time, such deficiencies weaken the case and may lead to evidence being disregarded.
Once pleadings and evidence are complete, the Registrar issues a notice of hearing to both parties.
Hearings can be conducted physically at the Trademark Registry or virtually via Cisco Webex.
During the hearing:
Both parties argue their case orally.
Reliance is placed on pleadings, evidence, and relevant judicial precedents.
Legal arguments typically cover likelihood of confusion, prior use, distinctiveness, or bad faith.
The Registrar then records the matter for decision.
After considering pleadings, evidence, and oral submissions, the Registrar passes a reasoned order.
Possible outcomes:
Opposition allowed → application is refused.
Opposition dismissed → trademark proceeds to registration.
Partial allowance → modifications imposed (limiting specification, disclaimers, etc.).
Aggrieved party may appeal before the High Court.
| Step/Activity |
Doer/Party |
Filling/Notice Date | Deadline |
| Journal Copy |
Published |
22 Nov 2023 | None |
| TM-O(NOTICE OF OPPOSITION) | Filed by Opponent | 08 Feb 2024 | 29 Mar 2024 |
| Opposition Notice |
Served to Applicant |
22 Feb 2024 | None |
| TM-O(COUNTER STATEMENT) |
Filed by Applicant |
20 Apr 2024 | 22 Jun 2024 |
| Counter Statement Notice |
Served to Opponent |
06 Jun 2024
|
None |
| Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 45 (TOP) |
Filed by Opponent |
05 Aug 2024 | 06 Aug 2024 |
| Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 46 (TOP) | Filed by Applicant | 04 Oct 2024 | 05 Oct 2024 |
| Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 47 (TOP) | Filed by Opponent | 01 Nov 2024 | 04 Nov 202 |
| Hearing Notice | Served to Both | 12 Mar 2025 | None |
| Step/Activity |
Doer/Party |
Filling/Notice Date | Deadline | REMARK |
| Journal Copy |
Published |
29/04/2024 | None | |
| TM-O(NOTICE OF OPPOSITION) | Filed by Opponent | 29/08/2024 | 29/08/2024 | |
| Opposition Notice |
Served to Applicant |
14/10/2024 | None | |
| TM-O(COUNTER STATEMENT) |
Filed by Applicant |
09/01/2025 | 14/02/2025 | Deadline Missed |
| Counter Statement Notice |
Served to Opponent |
16/01/2025
|
None | |
| Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 45 (TOP) |
Filed by Opponent |
14/03/2025 | 16/03/2025 | |
| Evidence Affidavit Under Rule 46 (TOP) | Filed by Applicant | 15/04/2025 | 14/05/2025 | |
| Hearing Notice | Served to Both | 22/04/2025 | For justifying the delay in filing the Counter-Statement |
| Stage | Cost (Official Fee) | Attorney/Agent Fees |
|---|---|---|
| Filing Opposition (Form TM-O) | ₹2700 (online) / ₹3,000 (physical) | ₹10,000–₹50,000+ depending on complexity |
| Counter-statement (Form TM-O) | ₹2700 (online) / ₹3,000 (physical) | ₹10,000–₹50,000+ depending on complexity and per opposition |
| Hearing Expenses | No fee | ₹20,000–₹1,00,000+, depending on complexity and number of hearing attended. |
Startups & MSMEs & Corporates: Opposition is a cost-effective way to prevent competitors from monopolizing similar marks. Ensures brand exclusivity and avoids dilution.
Investors & M&A: Ongoing opposition may affect brand valuation.
Well-Known Marks: Proactive opposition protects brand reputation globally.
Trademark opposition is a powerful preventive tool to protect your brand before a conflicting mark is registered. Filing timely opposition not only safeguards your goodwill but also strengthens your legal standing against future infringement.
Pro Tip for Startups/MSMEs: Always watch the Trademark Journal and set up monitoring services to detect similar marks early.
Q1. Can I oppose a trademark without being registered?
Yes, prior users and aggrieved parties can oppose.
Q2. Is opposition mandatory to prevent future use?
Yes, if you miss opposition, the mark may proceed to registration, making cancellation more complex.
Q3. What if I don’t reply to an opposition?
Your application is deemed abandoned.
Q4. Can I oppose multiple classes in one opposition?
Yes, but fee is charged per class.
Q5. What if opposition is rejected?
You may file an appeal before the High Court.